data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d761/4d761ead4e5fbeee24717e796134fe84ac07f65e" alt=""
(One thing about those sideways-knitted shawls: kinda hard to know exactly how long they’re going to be until you bind off. Surprise!)
Two of her most interesting observations: first, that the thing about knitting—the heart of its fascination—must be the act of transformation. Or as she’s saying in the picture below: we turn this (the ball of yarn) into this (the sock-in-progress), and that’s amazing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9d3b/d9d3bfce0b698ca93120c937eb41a51242631c81" alt=""
And the other: that she’d set out to write a book about knitting, but turns out to have written a book about knitters. Without drifting into Yeats’s puzzle--How can you tell the dancer from the dance?—it’s still worth noting how the mind slides away from matters of history or technique toward the human element—“I met a knitter who . . . “ or “Isn’t it funny how we . . . “ Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
It was great, Steph—come back soon!
No comments:
Post a Comment